2017/2018 Review: LATVIA

Overall rating

0 Bankability (%)
 Red Flags


1. Compliance
2. Effectiveness

Compliance / Effectiveness

≥ 90% Very high
70 - 89% High
50 - 69% Medium
30 - 49% Low

< 30% Very low


Concession/PPP Legislative Framework Assessment (LFA)

Concession/PPP Legal Framework
Selection of a Project
Selection of the Private Party
Project Agreement
Security and support issues


Legal Indicators Survey (LIS)
on Effectiveness

Policy Framework
Institutional framework
Award Statistics
PPP Business Environment

Summary Report



Latvia has a specific law on non-concession PPPs and concession PPPs that is sufficiently detailed and provides for rules on most of the relevant aspects. This corresponds with the “very high” compliance score.


The aspects covered well by the PPP Law are the award procedure, content of the project agreement, and project preparation including value-for-money assessment and affordability issues. The legal framework, which scores highly compliant for PPP and very high for concessions in general terms and medium/high relating to the selection of the private partner, also has some deficiencies. It does not lay down procedures for the selection of a PPP and the involvement of the public side in such award procedures. All this is covered by the public procurement law.

An advantage of the Latvian solution of not having different laws for PPPs, concessions and “normal“ public procurement may be that a harmonised regime for both concessions and non-concession PPPs exists so that investors and public officials do not have to switch between significantly different regimes just because of slight differences in the project model.

But there are also disadvantages with such a solution.

The legal framework does not address matters related to unsolicited proposals. The Legal framework prescribes the overall mandatory content of the contract but is silent on the content of the provisions, leaving it for the parties to negotiate. International arbitration is possible. Step-in rights without tender may be exercised under specific circumstances.


Latvia's weakness is the policy and institutional framework and its track record. This leads to a disappointing overall result of low compliance/effectiveness for both concessions and PPPs.

Latvia has a knowledge management entity, the PPP Advisory Council. Otherwise, the institutional framework is not highly developed.

Select a country:

Copyright 2018 © EBRD.
All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material contained on the EBRD’s web site for educational or other non commercial purposes are authorised without any prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the written permission of the copyright holders.

The presentation of material on this site does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). Information contained in the captions is true to the best of our knowledge.
This website has been prepared by CMS in cooperation with the EBRD’s Legal Transition Team. For more information about the data or site please contact: tyndalll@ebrd.com.